Feds Nix Two Tribal Gaming Compacts, Gov. Gavin Newsom Protests

Feds Nix Two Tribal Gaming Compacts, Gov. Gavin Newsom Protests.

Costfoto / NurPhoto / Getty Images

Key Takeaways

The US Department of the Interior decided not to approve Class III gaming compacts with two California tribes — the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria and the Middletown Rancheria of Pomo Indians — claiming that they violated portions of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.

Tachi Palace Casino ResortThe Tachi Palace Casino Resort in Lemoore, Calif, seen above. The federal government recently denied two compacts signed by the State of California, including one with the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria to expand their resort. (Image: tachipalace.com)

Both tribes were reportedly planning a “casino resort complex,” according to rejection letters sent to the tribes and the state. These plans include building new restaurants and hotels that operate beyond the gaming spaces regulated by the Tribe’s Gaming Commission.

Taking issue with several definitions in the compacts, the feds wrote, The 2022 compact confers expansive powers on the state and local governments to regulate the tribe’s activities and lands that are not directly related to the actual conduct of gaming.”

State-tribal Class III gaming compacts are agreements between the state and separate tribal governments that specify how many gaming devices and casinos a single tribe can operate, according to the Tribal Alliance of Sovereign Indian Nations.

The Santa Rosa Rancheria had planned to expand the gaming space in their Tachi Palace Casino Resort in Lemoore, Calif. by 44,000 square feet and build a 12-room hotel tower, a bingo hall/conference center, and a three-level garage.

Newsom Slams Decision

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) strongly rebuked the feds’ decision, warning of its repercussions. He said in a statement that the disapprovals Threaten the ability of these and other tribes to invest and maintain jobs in many of California’s economically disadvantaged communities.

He noted that the compacts were “carefully negotiated by the state and the tribes in compliance with the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act” to give tribes the “economic benefits of gaming while mitigating impacts to local communities.” And he noted that this latest agreement came on top of existing compacts signed between the tribes and the state in 1999.

This is the second time the Interior Department has disapproved of compacts with the same tribes, following a similar decision in November 2021.

California has ratified gaming compacts with 75 tribes, and currently hosts 66 casinos operated by 63 tribes, according to the California Gambling Control Commission.

Article Sources
Las Vegas Hotel Room Search Reveals 30 Dogs, 10 Dead editorial policy.
  1. New York Sets Final Tax Rates for Online Sports Betting; Amended Bids Due Monday

Compare Accounts
×
DraftKings CEO Waxes Bullish in Twitter Thread
Provider
Name
Description
Penn National Plans $750M Buyback, Eyes Full Acquisition of Barstool Sports  Viva Las Vegas: Sisolak Sets Target Date of June 4 for Nevada Casino Reopening  Duke No. 1 in Associated Press Basketball Poll, Favorite to Win Title  Wakayama Casino Developer Taps Former Sands Executive William Weidner  Gala Coral Agrees to Pay $1.2 Million Restitution for Failing to Prevent Money Laundering and Problem Gambling  Las Vegas Strip Fatal Punch Leads to Prison in Retired State Trooper’s Death  Rhode Island Launches iGaming, Seventh State to Regulate Online Casinos  VEGAS RESTAURANT ROUNDUP: Two More Burger Joints & One Less Vegan Option  iGaming – Four US States That May Legalize it in Near Future  New York Knicks Lose Center Mitchell Robinson for Three Weeks